Possibility 01
Create internal guidance on what staff may upload to AI tools.

Strategy, setup & adoption
Establish practical rules for AI use, information handling and human oversight, with specialist advice where required.
Discuss your AI usage guidanceMake the rules of AI use clear.
Identify tools, information flows, decision points and accountable owners.
Document approved activities, access, human reviews and incident escalation.
Prepare team-facing policies and a process for reviewing new tools or uses.
Explore each step. The approach is shaped around your tools, people and review needs.
See how it could workThe work behind the idea
AI adoption can spread faster than shared guidance about what staff may do with it. Practical governance makes responsibilities, permitted uses and escalation routes understandable to the people doing the work.
Create internal guidance on what staff may upload to AI tools.
Define approval checkpoints for an assistant that prepares customer communications.
Illustrative use cases, ready to adapt to your business. These are not claims of completed client work.
From question to a workable approach
Map current use: identify tools, information flows, decision points and accountable owners.
Define practical boundaries: document approved activities, access, human reviews and incident escalation.
Put guidance into use: prepare team-facing policies and a process for reviewing new tools or uses.
Define it together
Available to discuss and scope. The right approach depends on your systems, information, people and the decisions you want to support.
This work supports operational governance. It is not legal advice, an audit opinion or a certification of compliance with POPIA or another regulatory framework.
Let’s talk about your next step
Tell us where AI is already being used and which decisions need boundaries. We can scope practical guidance, ownership and human review for your team.
Discuss your AI usage guidance